millershollow ([info]millershollow) wrote,
2007-07-18 15:31:00

Day 3

Somewhere in another continent, a dark mage cackled with glee, "I have destroyed the world!!! With the power of my dark computer I have brought about the final destruction of LJ!" Suddenly a sword point appeared through his chest, he gasped and fell down to the ground dead. A cute blonde, looking beat, tired and a bit bloody stood over him, "Not on this slayer's watch, you filthy demon!" she said.

Suddenly far away, across many miles, Millers Hollow blinked back into existence. The townspeople looked stunned like something horrible had happened but were unsure of what. Looking up into the sky they saw that dawn was upon them. They began to do a head count and discovered that two of them were missing.

The first they came across was [info]maniakes. He looked surprised at the sudden blip in and out of the universe. Looking up at the rest of the village, he asked "What just happened?" Suddenly a *KABOOM* broke the morning silence and [info]maniakes's body flew to the left, smashed into a cottage, and crumpled to the ground dead. As he landed glass shattered and strange fluids oozed from his pocket.

The village looked to the right and saw [info]amphitrite27's bleeding form, mauled with savage cuts across it. "You filthy wolf, at least I took you with me." she smiled and then fell to the cobble stone street dead as well.

A hush went over the crowd, as [info]evilben clones arrived, roughly grabbed [info]ragnarok_now and manacled him leading him off to jail.

SUMMARY: [info]amphitrite27 the HUNTER is DEAD!

SUMMARY: [info]maniakes the WITCH is DEAD!

SUMMARY: [info]ragnarok_now is SEQUESTERED!

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    switch

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

     
    Help
  • 112 comments
Previous
← Ctrl← Alt
  • 1
  • 2
Next
Ctrl →Alt →

[info]cuddlycthulhu

July 18 2007, 22:48:56 UTC 4 years ago

...well, that answers why amphitrite voted for herself.

[info]gorillashaman

July 18 2007, 23:22:21 UTC 4 years ago

Not really.

Traditionally a HUNTER in danger of imminent lynching outs herself. Villagers let this slide, as they know that a false hunter will certainly be targeted by the real hunter.

Although I guess this was so early in the game that it wouldn't have mattered; an outed hunter would almost certainly get eaten in a wolfie effort to get a two-for-one.

I don't think I understand the "hunter votes for herself during tiebreaker" gambit she was trying to play. It didn't seem to be in our best interest. Her best hope would have been to vote for myshanter (which she eventually did) and hope she survived the night (which she didn't).

[info]cuddlycthulhu

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

July 18 2007, 22:50:47 UTC 4 years ago

vote evilben

[info]cuddlycthulhu

July 18 2007, 22:55:11 UTC 4 years ago

Why?

[info]cambler

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]evilben

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]cambler

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]evilben

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]cambler

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]evilben

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]cambler

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]creepyduck

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]evilben

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]dragonattack

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]evilben

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]lorriet

July 18 2007, 22:50:53 UTC 4 years ago

This is not good!

[info]dragonattack

July 18 2007, 22:52:47 UTC 4 years ago

I second that.

[info]cambler

July 18 2007, 22:56:29 UTC 4 years ago

Well, crap. I suspect that means the Seer won't be coming out any time soon.

[info]lorriet

July 18 2007, 22:58:44 UTC 4 years ago

Cambler certainly had that one pegged (amphitrites motives for voting for herself).

[info]makellan

July 18 2007, 23:03:29 UTC 4 years ago

I'm thinking that [info]rustymaggot's use of "if you argue with my logic, you're a wolf" and the random assigning of wolfishness today is far too suspicious.
vote [info]rustymaggot

[info]cambler

July 18 2007, 23:05:14 UTC 4 years ago

I'm not so sure. The very fast vote, above, suggests another possibility.

[info]makellan

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]cambler

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]makellan

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]daedalus4096

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]daedalus4096

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]makellan

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]evilben

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]gorillashaman

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]hungryandhollow

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]darkjuan

July 18 2007, 23:05:44 UTC 4 years ago

wow... the Hunter and the Witch in one stroke! 8o

[info]stride

July 18 2007, 23:17:43 UTC 4 years ago

Current summary:

baronlaw
blackbeardin
cambler
chessiekitty
cuddlycthulhu
daedalus4096
darkjuan
devil_engine
dragonattack
evilben
flipperchaz
giantlaser
gorillashaman
hungryandhollow
lorriet
makellan
maniakes
ragnarok_now
rustymaggot
stride

DEAD:
gnatdbug the VILLAGER
slojae the VILLAGER
sonicbunny the VILLAGER
amphitrite27 the HUNTER
myshanter the SERIAL KILLER
maniakes the WITCH

[info]gorillashaman

July 18 2007, 23:26:42 UTC 4 years ago

Remaining specials:

four wolves
seer
cupid
sorceror
magistrate
ralph nader
afflicted

[info]stride

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]hungryandhollow

July 18 2007, 23:17:57 UTC 4 years ago

vote rustymaggot

his insistence that we try to force a run-off every day makes me extremely suspicious.

p.s. no hunter and no witch, we are so fucked.

[info]makellan

July 18 2007, 23:20:28 UTC 4 years ago

At least we got rid of the serial killer (even though I voted wrong on that one). That way only one person dies per night now unless a lover is taken out.

[info]cuddlycthulhu

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]daedalus4096

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]stride

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]hungryandhollow

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]baronlaw

July 18 2007, 23:20:30 UTC 4 years ago

Well I didn't really mind having the serial killer killed, I gotta say losing the hunter and witch in one round is against the odds. Plus we have yet to kill a single wolf!

Looking back over those who were killed and their last accusations, I will have to vote once again for hungryandhollow.

Vote hungryandhollow

[info]hungryandhollow

July 18 2007, 23:29:35 UTC 4 years ago

not a wolf, and if you'd care to present a case against me i shall be happy to rebut it.

[info]baronlaw

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]hungryandhollow

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]baronlaw

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]lorriet

July 18 2007, 23:24:58 UTC 4 years ago

I have no idea where to go, especially with the voting that has happened in this thread already. It runs contrary to what little inklings I had in my head.

Hrm.

[info]makellan

July 18 2007, 23:31:02 UTC 4 years ago

What were you thinking and why?
We need as many theories as we can get here in hopes of getting a good one.

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]makellan

July 18 2007, 23:27:03 UTC 4 years ago

The wolves are being odd. They're taking out the runners up for most suspicious. You'd think they'd leave them alone and let the villagers take them out the following day. Not complaining, but still odd.

[info]lorriet

July 18 2007, 23:28:42 UTC 4 years ago

Except I don't think we would have taken Amphitrite out today. She'd been pretty convincing that she wasn't a wolf, I think. Tough to second guess, though.

[info]stride

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]lorriet

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]cuddlycthulhu

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]makellan

July 18 2007, 23:57:55 UTC 4 years ago

Ok, going quiet.
I'm hoping to hop on enough to not be disqualified but I'm getting married to [info]kalanasse this weekend. [info]maniakes and [info]stride will be in the party and can back me up that I'm pretty busy.

[info]lorriet

July 19 2007, 17:29:14 UTC 4 years ago

Hey wolfy, tell your lovely fiancée that I sent my best wishes! Congratulations! :)

[info]evilben

July 19 2007, 00:01:54 UTC 4 years ago

Not a wolf! Vanilla villager! Again! Jerks! I dare the seer to scan me (which, they undoubtedly already have, they way suspicion against me always friggen gos). Of course, the seer can't actually help me because outing themselves for one villager is suicide.

VOTE rustymaggot

Reasons?
A) I find his arguements and circular logic highly suspicious.
B) Had a crappy day at work and I'm feeling vindictive.

[info]rustymaggot

July 19 2007, 01:26:30 UTC 4 years ago

some of you say that my tactic of the purposeful initial tie is dangerous. i say it is a completely sane tactic. it is worth losing an extra villager once to gain knowledge. we can learn more in a shorter length of time even if the wolves get two kills. i dont think theres much chance of the wolves getting that second tie anyway.

it appears that ill be lynched next. so be it. when it is proven that i am just a plain villager, i ask that the remaining villagers kill those who voted on me.

do not abandon the initial tie, itis a valuable learning tool. i still maintain that only a fool, or a wolf, cannot see this. when i am dead, and proven a villager, LOOK AT THE MOST INTELLEGENT PLAYERS WHO OPPOSE MY TACTIC,THEY SHOULD BE LYNCHED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

[info]hungryandhollow

July 19 2007, 03:27:19 UTC 4 years ago

I have yet to see you address this simple problem with your tactic:

FOUR WOLVES CAN EASILY SWING A RUN-OFF TO THE NON-WOLF CANDIDATE.

Response?

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]hungryandhollow

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]hungryandhollow

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]hungryandhollow

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]hungryandhollow

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]hungryandhollow

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]evilben

4 years ago

  • Loading...
...and 2 more comments... from [info]chessiekitty, [info]lorriet Expand

[info]darkjuan

July 19 2007, 02:11:22 UTC 4 years ago

Ok...

VOTE rustymaggot due to the fact that he wants the people who voted for him dead.

[info]rustymaggot

July 19 2007, 02:51:38 UTC 4 years ago

why do you object for my asking for the death of my accusers? how many of the ones voting against me do you think are human? are you human?

[info]dragonattack

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]dragonattack

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]gorillashaman

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]chirpy_cricket

July 19 2007, 02:51:36 UTC 4 years ago

*chirp* *chirp* *chirp*

[info]creepyduck

July 19 2007, 17:11:21 UTC 4 years ago

quack!

*the duck looks over at the cricket, licks its bill, and begins to silently in its rabbit skin slippers stalk the poor insect*

[info]hungryandhollow

July 19 2007, 03:39:43 UTC 4 years ago

I'd just like to summarize some things i said buried in comment trees above.

1) I think rustymaggot's defense of the tied-vote idea is extremely suspicious.

2) I'd have yet to hear an argument against the theory that, in a tie situation, the wolves have a much easier time getting people to bandwagon the target THEY want lynched (which I think most villagers would agree with).

3) We've seen in every previous game that the way for villagers to win is through cooperating and adapting to the situations as they come. Even if he's just a villager with a radically different playstyle, rustymaggot's my-way-or-the-highway style threatens that.

4) Don't waste your time voting for evilben, I'll damn near guarantee he was one of the first people the Seer checked, thanks to his constantly being one of the first suspects. We'll find out about him soon enough, one way or the other.

[info]dragonattack

July 19 2007, 04:53:43 UTC 4 years ago

Once again, the observation of the missing:

Giantlaser (and with the timezone difference, it's understandable, but the mention is still necessary), Devil_engine, Blackbeardin, and Flipperchaz.

Where are you folks? What do you have to say?

[info]flipperchaz

July 19 2007, 05:00:56 UTC 4 years ago

Still at work, actually. And still considering which way to go here. For now, I abstain.

[info]blackbeardin

4 years ago

  • Loading...
...and 3 more comments... from [info]giantlaser, [info]devil_engine, [info]dragonattack Expand

[info]chessiekitty

July 19 2007, 06:09:33 UTC 4 years ago

Sucky about losing the hunter and the witch.

I still don't trust Daedalus or Giantlaser. Gorillashaman has moved up on my list of suspects. Rustymaggot has also moved into my radar. For now Vote Rustymaggot

Because I really think the forcing a tie is a bad idea, as it can be too easily manipulated by the wolves. And I just get a "feeling".

There are three possibilities with a tie.
1. Two villagers
2. Two wolves
3. Wolf and Villager

In case 1 it doesn't matter who gets lynched, the wolves are happy, a villager dies.

Case 2, there's nothing that can be done, the wolves are going to lose one of their number. But... probably villagers will think of the other wolf as a villager, since it's unlikely to get a tie between two wolves.

Case 3, If the three other wolves simply sacrifice the tied wolf, then they look more like villagers than wolves.

So really, I don't see how forcing a tie helps anyone but the wolves.

[info]giantlaser

July 19 2007, 08:40:30 UTC 4 years ago

I don't trust hungryandhollow, rustymaggot, or makellan. They've all been vocal about their accusations, which draws suspicion faster than the quiet players such as myself.

[info]hungryandhollow

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]giantlaser

July 19 2007, 08:41:29 UTC 4 years ago

I abstain

rustymaggot is doomed anyway, but I'm not convinced he's a wolf. And I don't want to be part of a dogpile that cannot be reversed if I'm not reading near the end of the day.

[info]chessiekitty

July 19 2007, 12:41:58 UTC 4 years ago

For the record, I am sure at least one wolf, probably a new player, is laying low and being quiet, or at least posting short, non-accusatory type posts.

[info]devil_engine

July 19 2007, 14:57:31 UTC 4 years ago

vote [info]rustymaggot

The whole forcing a tie is entirely too suspicious

[info]cuddlycthulhu

July 19 2007, 16:14:48 UTC 4 years ago

Rules Clarification:

Starting tomorrow at about ten I'll be away from a computer camping.

Is it possible to set up a vote in advance or must I be present at the time in order to vote?

[info]stride

July 19 2007, 16:52:32 UTC 4 years ago

Re: Rules Clarification:

You should be able to talk to [info]millershollow via email to set something up.

[info]lorriet

July 19 2007, 17:03:55 UTC 4 years ago

Well, crap. I just don't know. I don't think rustymaggot is a wolf, though his doom seems inevitable at this point. It just seems like he was intentionally putting himself on the chopping block. I just hope it's not a situation like amphitrite that could lose us another villager, or worse.

Makellan and evilben seem suspicious to me. Cambler, too.

For now, I'll VOTE Makellan, even though it seems the dogpile (mostly self-inflicted) is on rustymaggot.

[info]cambler

July 19 2007, 17:11:08 UTC 4 years ago

How can I seem suspicious? I've voted with the mod and even hinted at something that would be villager-beneficial!

[info]lorriet

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]cambler

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]cuddlycthulhu

4 years ago

  • Loading...

[info]rustymaggot

4 years ago

  • Loading...
Previous
← Ctrl← Alt
  • 1
  • 2
Next
Ctrl →Alt →
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…